replica handbags

The courtesy of Hongming brother care and told me to write something, but also specifically sent a few sample reported. I recently worry Evans Kuse, see articles talking about the article, I feel that this topic can also say something, but do not know where to start. Just some time ago wrote a small article about John Macy, "the story of literature in translation, in a newspaper published at, I saw so many words:" In its entirety, this book still beyond the obstacles, let us appreciate its wonderful colorful feel the shadow of the sun mottled, as in the forest. "inevitably some marvel, this does not seem to my article. To identify the original, is written: "This book at least a portion of the benefits will still be able to go beyond the obstacles, let us realize. 'Part' is already a lot." Look at the subject, the original 'wonderful' personal see ', now changed to "the shadow of the sun mottled forest." The title of the article, is not my. I say this not correct meaning, a mere one small article, altered or not, had no value at all; just want to talk about the article, but can be an example. Does not mean that my article is there is more than good, others alteration does not; article I think this thing is not easy to grasp, will afford a person a person's views. For example, here, about that I write tedious to add a little "taste", but to be honest I write articles, try to avoid precisely this kind of "taste" has always been worried about just can not avoid. However others want so written, I think it might also have their reasons to strike. In fact, we can not tell what the article and what is not; article has no definite rules, in addition to the typo wrong sentences, people how to write; just not how to write. Can not take this topic to qualify the others, only limited. I know what to write; say the least, know you do not want to write what. Probably ways of writing, it was in here.
    Regarding the article I read many years, little experience; later learn to write, is not without ideas. Are only their own use, has nothing to do with others; articles I want to write, love to read articles, substantially beyond that way. Front summarized as four sentences, that is a good word to say, reasonable, unorthodox, not rules. This involves a view of the past history of prose, and also about the pursuit of a style. Recently I feel able Yigai the attributed to the author's attitude. Have a meaning, in fact, honestly written on paper; If we can achieve clear, why do you want to describe some. We usually speak, who kept mouthful of adjectives, Figures of Speech or sentence parallelism, people listen to how awkward. I think this is a little difference of poetry and essays, prose poetry can not then words. Poetry should be a little virtual, the prose but wish to sit real. The past, I wrote poems, although the Offer, to describe a few always will; writing prose, I do not think this is necessary. For not describe, do not like, but do not need to do not trust. This is probably also involved in the problem of the "beauty". In fact, the United States is more than one, and for prose to describe the United States may not be. At least not describe can also be beautiful, but much harder to nothing. Rustic and simple not blindly reduction, is less, to achieve the fullest performance by limiting the performance. May send fewer words in handy, it is even more use carefully. The article is not just the literal; wants to express the meaning, literally as a means of expression, as well as both the correspondence between be called articles. Of course, if anyone only like to see the literal, that say there is no fate, had Anything you say.
    On the other hand, describe hierarchical. The United States is not just beautiful, and beautiful should be so beautiful. Just say no to describe more difficult, in fact, it may not be easy to describe. Usually called "hackneyed" for describing, does not describe at least Cangzhuo. Rare little fresh feelings, these feelings in their own words out even more effort. The Chinese vernacular articles, do almost the same overripe, simply click the pen down stereotypes. A fall stereotypes, into hackneyed, not to mention what the article. I like the two essayist Zhou Zuoren and Fei Ming, writing articles are rarely described, in fact, this is not to be excluded. Such as the Analects small mind "in this section:
    'Master Zhi appropriate Qi, Asian rice dry applicable Chu, three meals a sail appropriate Cai, four rice lack of appropriate Qin, drum side tert into in the river, sowing drum used by peddlers weapons into at Han, less teacher Yang, strike Qing Xiang into the sea.' I do not know wherefore, I read "The Analects of Confucius" in the child read this chapter, it is felt an air of sadness, as if the end of the Grand View Garden, Grandmother Jia's death, a group of women pursue their look. "
    Describe metaphor, but at least in my opinion, to be considered very good article. Feelings are real, the performance is natural, everything is just right. If you can describe to envy, I do they do not want to try now do not have this ability. "Poetry," says: "Gaoshanyangzhi, Kageyuki behavior." Wish too literally two "ended" as do certain things: you can not describe not describe it better than the abuse described a little better strike.